Ask MCP: Lesson Classifications Are Causing Confusion

I was trying to explain must do, should do, and aspire to do to a colleague. Their argument was “If I tell a student they should do something then I mean it needs to be done.” How would you explain the three categories? - Classify This

Dear Classify,

Lesson classifications (like Must Do, Should Do, Aspire to Do; Mild, Medium, Spicy, or whichever naming convention you choose) helps facilitate differentiation in your Modern Classroom lessons. They help us plan our learning activities for each lesson or unit with the idea that some of our learners may struggle with understanding the learning objective and need more support while others quickly show mastery.

In my science classroom, all students were required to do vocabulary work, watch the instructional video, complete the practice activity to process the new concepts explained in the instructional video, and complete a mastery check to demonstrate what they have understood. These were the base of my lessons and Must Do activities. Regardless if a student was present for every class or absent for half the unit, they knew these were the four activities they needed to work on to master the lesson and work towards mastering the end-of-unit summative.

Should Do learning activities are scaffolded from your Must Do activities to provide opportunities for your learners to extend their thinking and apply their newfound knowledge from their Must Do activities. For example, some of the practice materials I had were repetitive in the questions they asked or the problems they had my learners practice. So I would remove the repetitive questions and put them into a Should Do activity for my learners who needed more support or remediation. I also had one Should Do activity in a different format (a game, sort cards, quizlet, etc.) for my learners, who paced quickly through the Must Do practice activity to extend their learning and thinking on the learning objective.

And then we have our Aspire to Dos. These activities provide a more significant challenge to students, allowing them to apply multiple learning activities and lessons to deepen their understanding of the learning objectives. Only some students will reach these activities, but we create opportunities for them to attempt the challenge. Each of my units, which were multiple lessons long, incorporated one real-world-based, challenging activity that culminated everything they should have mastered in that unit. Offering opportunities for students to remediate, extend their thinking, and challenge themselves allows them to reflect on what they have understood in the unit and take ownership of their learning while building self-regulation skills.

In short, Must Do: read this entire blurb; Should Do: check out these resources on Lesson Classification; Aspire to Do: let your colleague know we’re happy to dive in even more about lesson classifications in an upcoming VMP session with them.


This might be a dumb question: but is MCP more about student pacing or using blended learning? My takeaway from the limited knowledge I have is that it is student-paced. If so, should we not assign lessons for homework (if they don’t finish in one “period”) and let the kids go through the course at their ability? Or assign homework and keep them moving? - MCP for Dummies

Dear MCP for Dummies,

MCP is about both student self-pacing and blended learning, with a focus on mastery. Each student self-paces through their learning activities differently, and blended learning allows educators to check in with particular students as they self-pace.

Still, the beauty of self-pacing is that each learning activity in the lesson or unit has a soft deadline that helps identify to students where they should be on any given day. The overall lesson or unit has a hard deadline of when all activities should be completed and turned in, which signifies to students that we are moving on to the next learning objective. If students do not complete their activities in class, they can work on them at home. If outside circumstances prevent them from working on the activities at home, they know they have a certain length of time to work through the material and seek support where needed. In my classroom, I built mini checkpoints to see which learners were not progressing effectively and determine if they required small group remediation with me.

An example of a interactive Public Facing Tracker from a Modern Classroom

An example of a interactive Public Facing Tracker from a Modern Classroom


Any idea how to convince your admin that doing this it is valuable even if you do not call it a flipped classroom? - Advocating for Admin

Good teaching is good teaching, and the Modern Classrooms Project allows you to take the amazing work you’re already doing with your learners to provide a personalized learning experience to each unique student sitting in your classroom.

While Modern Classrooms may share some similarities to a flipped classroom (mainly, blended instruction), self-pacing and mastery-based learning are essential, research-backed elements of our model that make this approach more actionable for educators and impactful for students.

Mastery Checks allow you to monitor the progress of your learners’ understanding as they work towards the summative. It provides a checkpoint for learners to evaluate their understanding and seek support if needed. Research has shown that chunking learning activities in this way reduces the cognitive load of students and supports learners with retaining information long-term. As students are self-pacing through their differentiated learning tasks, educators can lead one-on-one check-ins or small group support with specific learners through the data they’ve gathered from their mastery checks. Blended learning allows learners to revisit and reflect on their work as often as needed. Finally, constructive and timely feedback on mastery checks supports frequent reflection opportunities for both learners and educators. When learners can set goals and reflect on their learning, they develop more productive academic habits while being encouraged to challenge themselves.

If calling it a flipped classroom helps others understand what you are doing better, that’s fine. So long as you know it’s a flipped classroom, and so much more.


Debbie Menard
Director of Virtual Mentorship

Debbie Menard earned her BS in Biology at University of the Sciences in Philadelphia. After taking a gap year with Americorps NCCC, she earned her MAT at University of Virginia and has been teaching Biology in VA and DC ever since. As a high school teacher for the past nine years, she has facilitated students in Title 1 schools in increasing their critical thinking skills, and discovering science through exploring the world around them. Debbie has recently graduated from American University with her M.Ed in Educational Policy. She firmly believes that supporting teachers in creating a sound education will support students in becoming the best adults they can be.

Debbie lives in Washington, DC. When not on a zoom call, she enjoys finding amazing restaurants with rooftops and experimenting with different natural hairstyles.


Looking for more Ask MCP questions? “I feel I bit off more than I could chew last week. I was drowning in papers!!! Any advice for how you’ve stayed productive?” Read Emily Dia’s response to this question.

Previous
Previous

Supporting Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Communities

Next
Next

Grading for Equity